Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctoranytime

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:35, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Doctoranytime[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional Viztor (talk) 14:01, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Viztor (talk) 14:01, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:23, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a clear PR piece/possible UPE but it's also not notable and lacks entirely in any in depth coverage from independent sources. Praxidicae (talk) 14:52, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with above concerns. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:55, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:18, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:19, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:19, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:19, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I removed what seemed to be a PR piece and added a new paragraph about an initiative that supports this business. It should be ok now Elberoin (talk) 11:17, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Elberoin: - what sources do you think demonstrate WP:NCORP is satisfied? Nosebagbear (talk) 20:46, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.